Journal # 7

Wikipedia--Ban it or Boost it? by Doug Johnson explores the merits (and concerns) of this ever-popular site that one million visitors go to daily. Johnson quotes philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer stating: " All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Johnson supposes that Wikipedia has already gone through the three stages of truth. It is true, occasionally false works do appear on Wikipedia, but noted historians have found Wikipedia to be distinctly accurate--that the self-governing and reporting on Wikipedia do seem to work. Johnson also quotes New Yorker contributor Stacy Skiff's commentary on how Wikipedia allows us to do research that was never previously available in traditional encyclopedias. Wikipedia is also current, timely and continuously updated. Finally, the author suggests perusing the Kathy Schrock guide regarding how to determine reliability/accuracy on her website.

Question 1: Would I allow students to use Wikipedia for scholarly research? Absolutely. It can be one very useful resource (coupled with other in-depth research) for students. I would caution students against using/consutling any page that has been flagged, and again, require additional research, as well.

Question 2: Is it appropriate for sites like Wikipedia--that is, those that can be editied by anyone--to exist? Wikipedia is continuously monitored, and posts warnings, so I feel it is an acceptable site to consult for information. It does, indeed, though, pose questions as to the current age of technology and how we obtain information.